Discuss. Reach consensus. Give useful feedback.
Review the entry
Judges consider the historical work and the category-specific presentation using the official evaluation form.
Work as a team
NHD judges generally work in teams of three.
Discuss and rank
NHD uses consensus judging. Judges discuss the entries and rank them together rather than simply adding numerical scores.
Provide feedback
Students use judge feedback to revise projects between contest levels. They may refine research, analysis, title, and presentation, but they may not change the topic.
How the 2026 affiliate organized judging
The Korea guide describes judges working in teams, first evaluating independently and then discussing entries together to reach a consensus ranking.
Feedback is part of the job
The Korea guide emphasizes detailed, substantive comments that explain both strengths and areas for improvement. Feedback should help students understand how their historical work and presentation can improve.